Curricula

School YearMajor
2021-2022MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NURSING

MSN Program Description

The Master of Science in Nursing program (academic track) is designed to train professional nurses for advanced practice in adult, mother and child, community, and psychiatric-mental health nursing as well as for roles in nursing administration. The program is set to meet the needs of local and international healthcare settings for nurses with advanced degrees in the science of nursing.

Relevant subject benchmark statements and other external and internal

CHED CMO 15 s 2019

View

AACN’s The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education

View

National Nursing Core Competency Standards

View

MSN Program of Study

View

Educational Philosophy

The University clearly articulates the kind of education that it envisions for its students in its mission statement, which reads: To offer accessible quality education that transforms students into persons of conscience, competence, and compassion, all for the glory of God. This mission statement is the enduring declaration of purpose and guiding premise in the University’s concept of good teaching.

 

To ensure the achievement of good teaching, the University embraces the constructivist paradigm in teaching and learning. Each Angelite student is actively involved in the process of constructing meaning and knowledge in their academic disciplines. The University gives preeminent value to the development of students’ active constructive process in learning.  This is realized through the practice of teaching that supports the constructive processing of understanding rather than the mere delivery of the information to students.  All these underscore the University’s commitment to place the best interests of students at the topmost spot in the hierarchy of its priorities.  As the HAU Quality Policy proclaims with resounding clarity: We are all about students.

 

The School of Nursing and Allied Medical Sciences as the component degree-granting unit operationalizes the University’s constructivist educational philosophy. Furthermore, its constructivist teaching is designed within the purview of outcomes-based education (OBE). The School has consciously focused and organized its program of instruction around the clearly defined outcomes that the students must be able to perform and demonstrate. The clarity of focus is manifested in the constructive alignment between and among learning outcomes, teaching-learning activities, and assessment tasks. Constructive alignment is a process and an outcome goal that is continuously quality assured.

Expected Learning Outcomes of the MSN Program

The program’s expected learning outcomes are articulated distinctly but coherently as institutional student learning outcomes (ISLOs), program educational objectives (PEOs), and program outcomes (POs).

Institutional Student Learning Outcomes

  1. Show effective communication
  2. Demonstrate appropriate value and sound ethical reasoning
  3. Apply critical and creative thinking
  4. Utilize civic and global learning
  5. Use applied and collaborative learning
  6. Employ aesthetic engagement
  7. Show Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy

Program Educational Objectives

An Angelite MS in Nursing graduate is expected to:

  1. Demonstrate advanced knowledge and skills in adult health nursing, community health nursing, mother and child nursing, psychiatric/mental health nursing, and nursing administration for professional practice, self-directed research, and lifelong learning.
  2. Apply the concepts, theories, and research evidence in nursing for advanced and independent practice.
  3. Work with substantial degree of independence that involves leadership in the chosen specialization (i.e., adult health nursing, community health nursing, mother and child nursing, psychiatric/mental health nursing, and nursing administration)

Program Outcomes

After finishing the program, the students will be able to:

  1. Examine the concept of caring as an essence of nursing.
  2. Develop programs and policies that impact population health locally and globally.
  3. Articulate understanding of nursing knowledge and knowledge from various disciplines as a means of these expressions.
  4. Integrate evidence-based methodologies to address complex health problems and ensure optimal care.
  5. Engage in professional collaboration across professions, care team members, patients, families, communities, and other stakeholders.
  6. Demonstrate reflective practice that fosters personal growth, lifelong learning, and leadership opportunities.
  7. Apply quality improvement and safety principles in fulfilling nursing functions in any setting.
  8. Project a professional identity that reflects nursing’s characteristics and values.
  9. Conduct research that informs nursing discipline, impacts best practice, and influences policy.

 

Institutional Student Learning Outcomes and Performance Indicators

 

ISLOsPerformance Indicators

1. Communication

1. Create sustained, coherent arguments or explanations summarizing their work or that of collaborators in two or more media or languages for both general and specialized audiences.

2. Valuing and Ethical Reasoning

1. Engage in the habit of reflection and contemplation.
2. Articulate and challenge a tradition, assumption, or prevailing practice within the field of study by raising and examining relevant ethical perspectives through a project, paper, or performance.
3. Distinguish human activities and judgments subject to ethical reasoning from those not subject to ethical reasoning.
4. Practice transparency and accountability, lead by example, and demonstrate honesty and integrity at all times and in all circumstances.

3. Critical and Creative Thinking

1. Disaggregate, reformulate, and adapt principal ideas, techniques or methods at the forefront of the field of study in carrying out an essay or project.
2. Employ logical, mathematical, or statistical methods appropriate to addressing a topic or issue in the primary field.
3. Articulate and undertake multiple appropriate applications of quantitative methods, concepts, and theories in the field of study.
4. Identify, choose, and defend the choice of a mathematical model appropriate to a problem in the social sciences or applied sciences.
5. Develop ideas that are new, unique, transdisciplinary, and worthy of further investigation.

4. Civic and Global Learning

1. Assess and develop a position on a public policy question with significance in the field of study, taking into account both scholarship and published or electronically posted positions and narratives of relevant interest groups.
2. Develop a formal proposal, real or hypothetical, to a non-governmental organization addressing a global challenge that has not been adequately addressed in the field of study.
3. Propose a path to resolution of a problem in the field of study that is complicated by competing national interests or by rival interests within a nation other than the Philippines.

5. Applied and Collaborative Learning

1. Create a project, paper, exhibit, performance or other appropriate demonstration reflecting the integration of knowledge acquired in the practicum, work, community or research activities with knowledge and skills gleaned from at least two fields of study in different segments of the curriculum and articulate the ways the two sources of knowledge influenced the result.
2. Design and implement a project or performance in an out-of-class setting that requires the application of advanced knowledge gained in the field of study to a practical challenge, articulates in writing or another medium the insights gained in the field of study to a practical challenge.
3. Articulate in writing or another medium the insights gained from the project or performance in an out-of-class setting.
4. Assess (with appropriate citations) approaches, scholarly debates, or standards for professional performance applicable to the challenge.

6. Aesthetic Engagement

1. Experiment with course material to innovate and participate in any creative process.
2. Collaborate with others in creative processes or aesthetic engagement.

7. Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Literacy

1. Determine the nature and extent of the information needed.
2. Access needed information effectively and efficiently.
3. Evaluate information and its sources critically and incorporate selected information into their knowledge base and value system
4. Individually or as a member of a group, use information effectively to accomplish a specific purpose.
5. Understand many of the economic, legal, and social issues surrounding the use of information.
6. Access and use information ethically and legally.

 

Institutional Student Learning Outcomes (ISLOs) mapped onto the elements of the HAU core purpose (mission statement) 

 

ISLOsPerson of ConsciencePerson of CompetencePerson of Compassion
Communication 

*

*

Valuing and Ethical Reasoning

*

  
Critical and Creative Thinking 

*

 
Civic and Global Learning

*

*

*

Applied and Collaborative Learning 

*

*

Aesthetic Engagement  

*

ICT Literacy

*

*

 

 

MSN Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) mapped onto the elements of the HAU core purpose (mission statement) 

 

PEOsPerson of ConsciencePerson of CompetencePerson of Compassion
PEO1

*

*

*

PEO2 

*

 
PEO3 

*

 

 

MSN Program Outcomes (POs) mapped onto the elements of the HAU core purpose (mission statement) 

 

 

POsPerson of ConsciencePerson of CompetencePerson of Compassion
PO1

*

*

*

PO2

*

*

*

PO3 

*

 
PO4

*

*

*

PO5

*

*

*

PO6

*

 

*

PO7 

*

 
PO8

*

 

*

PO9 

*

 

 

Institutional Student Learning Outcomes (ISLOs) mapped onto the elements of the HAU core purpose (mission statement) 

ISLOsPerson of ConsciencePerson of CompetencePerson of Compassion

Communication

 

*

*

Valuing and Ethical Reasoning

*

 

*

Critical and Creative Thinking

 

*

 

Civic and Global Learning

*

*

*

Applied and Collaborative Learning

 

*

*

Aesthetic Engagement

 

 

*

ICT Literacy

*

*

 

Mapping of MSN Courses along Program Outcomes

COURSES

PROGRAM OUTCOMES

Level of Organization

Course Title

PO1

PO2

PO3

PO4

PO5

PO6

PO7

PO8

PO9

 

Core Courses

GSNCARING: Advanced Nursing Theories in Nursing

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNPOLDEV: Program Policy and Development

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and Scholarship

GSNADNURES: Advanced Nursing Research

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

GSNADSTATS: Advanced Statistics

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

GSNINSTUDY: Independent Study

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

GSNCRITREAD: Critical Readings

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Thesis

GSNTHESEMINAR: Thesis Seminar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

GSNTHESWRI: Thesis Writing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

major in Adult Health Nursing

GSNAHN1: Advanced Pathophysiology in Adult Health Nursing

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNAHN2: Advanced Pharmacology in Adult Health Nursing

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNAHN3: Advanced Caring in Acute and Trauma Settings

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

GSNAHN4: Advanced Caring in Chronic and Multi-organ Conditions

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

GSNAHN5: Gerontologic Nursing and Health Aging

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

GSNAHN6: Practicum in Adult Health Nursing

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

major in Mother and Child Nursing

GSNMCN1: Advanced Pathophysiology in Mother and Child Nursing 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNMCN2: Advanced Pharmacology in Mother and Child Nursing 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNMCN3: Advanced Maternity Nursing 

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

GSNMCN4: Advanced Pediatric Nursing 

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

GSNMCN5: Special Topics in Mother and Child Nursing 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

GSNMCN6: Practicum in Mother and Child Nursing 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

major in Psychiatric/ Mental Health Nursing

GSNMHN1: Mental Health Issues Across the Lifespan 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNMHN2: Advanced Psychopathology in Mental Health Nursing

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNMHN3: Advanced Pharmacology in Mental Health Nursing

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNMHN4: Cognitive, Behavioral, and Alternative Interventions in Individual and Group Settings 

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

GSNMHN5: Mental Health Nursing for Populations with Special Needs

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

GSNMHN6: Practicum in Mental Health Nursing 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

major in Community Health Nursing

GSNCHN1: Advanced Pathophysiology in Community Health Nursing

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNCHN2: Advanced Pharmacology Community Health Nursing

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNCHN3: Primary Health Care Nursing

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

GSNCHN4: Family Health Nursing 

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

 

 

 

GSNCHN5: Population-based Nursing Care

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

GSNCHN6: Practicum in Community Health Nursing

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

major in Nursing Administration

GSNAD1: Leadership in Nursing Service Administration

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNAD2: Quality Management in Nursing Service Administration

 

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

GSNAD3: Resource Management in Nursing Service Administration

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNAD4: Systems Thinking in Nursing Service Administration 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

GSNAD5: Strategic Management in Nursing Service Administration

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

GSNAD6: Practicum in Nursing Administration

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

X

 

 

Teaching-Learning Principles and Approaches

The School actualizes OBE with its outcomes-based teaching and learning (OBTL) at the class level. In OBTL, academic staff frame their instruction in a fashion where the outcomes determine the instructional content, the teaching methods and strategies, and the assessment process. They make OBTL apparent in their observance of the following teaching and learning principles:

Teaching Principles

  1. Teaching involves getting relevant information about students to guide the design of instruction.
  2. Teaching involves expressing clear expectations about how learning takes place.
  3. Teaching involves focusing on the essential knowledge and skills.
  4. Teaching involves recognizing and overcoming expert blind spot.
  5. Teaching involves adopting appropriate teaching roles to support student learning.
  6. Teaching involves continuous improving of learning plans based on feedback and reflection.

Learning Principles

  1. Students’ prior knowledge can help or hinder learning.
  2. Students’ ways of organizing knowledge influence how they learn and apply what they know.
  3. Students’ motivation determines, directs, and sustains what they do to learn.
  4. Students develop mastery by acquiring knowledge and skills, practicing integration, and knowing when to apply what they have learned.
  5. Students’ quality of learning is enhanced by goal-directed practice and targeted feedback.
  6. Students’ developmental level interacts with the social, emotional, and intellectual climate of the course to impact learning.
  7. Students must know how to monitor and adjust their approaches to learning to become self-directed learners.

The teaching and learning in the program happen both at the conceptual/theoretical and practical levels. Academic staff teach students in lecture courses in either classroom-based on online mode. They design learning plans that reflect teaching-learning activities that promote active learning by making the students do the work. They use several student-centered teaching strategies that do away with them as constant source of information. The practical instruction, on the other hand, is done by providing students with structured clinical learning experience that is anchored on program outcomes.

Assessment and Evaluation

The School bases its practice with the three central purposes of assessment:

  1. Assessment as learning – students reflect on and monitor their progress based on the feedback of the academic staff (i.e., student-centered formative assessment); and
  2. Assessment for learning – academic staff use inferences about student progress to inform their teaching (i.e., teacher-centered formative assessment); and
  3. Assessment of learning – academic staff use evidence of learning to appraise student achievement of outcome, goals, and standards (i.e., summative assessment).

Program Quality Assurance

The program conforms to Holy Angel University’s pursuit for academic excellence, hence its administrators shall continuously strive to do better. To achieve this, the programs is subjected to accreditation and ISO certification.

Aside from institutional quality assurance initiatives, parallel program-based initiatives are carried out. The Graduate Program Coordinator facilitates the annual program audit in terms of learning plans updating, outcomes evaluation, and collegial instructional supervision. The Program Advisory Council, which serves to provide the School with inputs from stakeholders, will be regularly convened for the purpose of program improvement.

All these program and institutional level initiatives are anchored on the University’s Quality Policy, to wit:

We all about our students!

Holy Angel University is committed to the holistic development of students through education, research, extension, and administrative services that conform to global standards of quality, comply with local and international statutory and regulatory requirements, and abide by the University’s Catholic foundation.

The University’s senior management regularly reviews and validates all programs, services, and processes for the improvement of its quality management system. This quality management system shall be communicated, implemented, and supported by the entire organization and other interested parties.

The MSN program was first offered by the HAU Graduate School of Nursing in 2011. The University submitted the program to quality assessment which received candidate status from the Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities-Commission on Accreditation (PACUCOA) in 2014. After a successful validation visit, PACUCOA granted Level I accredited status to the program in 2017. In that year, the Graduate School of Nursing was also functionally integrated with the College of Nursing and Allied Medical Sciences, thereby transferring program administration to the latter.

Admission Criteria or Requirements to the Program

The basic requirements for admission in the MSN program are:

  1. Graduate of accredited schools of BS in Nursing;
  2. Photocopy of Marriage Certificate (if married);
  3. Original and Copy of Official Transcript of Records (TOR remarks should be for Holy Angel University);
  4. Two (2) copies of 1.5 x 1.5 latest photo;
  5. Satisfactory admission test scores;
  6. Satisfactory interview results;
  7. Two Letters of Recommendation:
    1. College or University Professor; and,
    2. Current or Former Employer.
  8. Processing fee

Graduation Requirements

  • General Weighted Average of 2.00 or better in all subjects taken
  • Completion of 39-42 units of the prescribed courses
  • Passing the written comprehensive examination
  • Publication in peer-reviewed journals
  • Successful defense and submission of bound copies of thesis

Curricula

School YearMajor
2021-2021 Master of Science in Nursing

GUIDELINES ON THE MASTER’S WRITTEN COMPREHENSIVE EXAMINATION

The written comprehensive examination (WCE) is a demonstration of the student’s culmination of their learning in the master’s program. It also provides a more comprehensive evaluation of the student’s knowledge in the fields of nursing, health services administration, and radiologic technology and their respective concentrations. The WCE is taken and must be passed before the student’s candidacy to the master’s degree.

Purpose

The WCE is the assessment strategy in determining if the students demonstrate:

  1. strong analytical, critical thinking, and problem-solving abilities;
  2. required breadth and depth of knowledge of the discipline (nursing, health services administration, and radiologic technology) and their concentrations (teaching, leadership and management, nursing administration, adult health nursing, mother and child nursing, community health nursing, psychiatric-mental health nursing);
  3. required academic background for the specific master’s research to follow;
  4. potential ability to conduct independent and original research; and
  5. ability to communicate knowledge of the discipline.

Schedule

  1. The Graduate Programs Coordinator (GPC) specifies the timing of the WCE, including the earliest and latest dates by which it must be completed.
  2. Students are informed of the specific dates of their examination so that they have adequate time to prepare. This is crucial because of the importance of the examination and consequences of failure. The WCE is scheduled on the trimester that follows the enrollment of terminal academic courses. It is administered within two full days of eight hours each day.
  3. Students accomplish the WCE Form and submit it to the Office of the Dean to initiate the application process.

The WCE Committee

At the time the student applies for the comprehensive examination, the GPC forms the comprehensive examination committee.  This committee includes three to five professors who taught the master’s courses.  The members of the WCE Committee write and grade the examination and indicate a satisfactory performance of a student. They may determine also that there is a deficiency and that a re-take is necessary. A deficiency is thought to exist when one or more answers are graded as unsatisfactory. 

The Committee consists of the:

  • Chair: a professor in the master’s program who has taught one or two of the courses offered under the same program
  • Members: two professors who handle each of the concentrations in the master’s program; the GPC; and the Dean as ex-officio member.

 

Scope and Format

The content of the WCE must be consistent with its purpose. Students are given the following information: subject areas to be included in the exam and the range of material to be tested and suggestions as to how to cover this material (e.g., reading lists, courses, refereed journals, etc.).

The WCE consists of integrative questions about the specific discipline and concentrations and the student’s specific research area and associated methods. The student will choose six (6) from at least 10 questions distributed as follows:

  • Part 1: four (4) questions (from at least six (6) questions) from the specific disciplines (nursing, health services administration, and radiologic technology) and their concentrations (teaching, leadership and management, nursing administration, adult health nursing, mother and child nursing, community health nursing, psychiatric-mental health nursing); and
  • Part 2: two (2) questions (from at least four (4) questions) from the research and scholarship courses.

Evaluation

The WCE is not designed as a barrier but a straightforward evaluation of the student’s command of their declared fields and their preparation to move on to the challenges of writing the thesis. Its evaluation is based on the stated purpose. Students are provided with outline of the exam and are informed as to how each of the parts of the examination is factored into the committee’s final decision. Grading of the WCE is either Pass or Fail. A maximum of two attempts on each WCE is allowed.

Faculty Profile

The 12 members of the academic staff are assigned to teach their respective MSN courses based on their professional and educational qualifications. The Department also considers the extent of work experience and areas of nursing practice of the faculty in the commission of teaching loads. Nurse clinicians are delegated to relevant courses that teach clinical nursing specializations while those with extensive leadership and management portfolio are assigned to courses in nursing administration major.

Most members of the academic staff are recognized as leaders in the Philippine nursing community as evidenced by their current and past involvement as officers and consultants in some of the national and international nursing organizations. These organizations include the Philippine Nurses Association (PNA), Philippine Nursing Research Society (PNRS), Association of Nursing Service Administrators of the Philippines (ANSAP), and Association of Deans of Philippine Colleges of Nursing (ADPCN). The academic staff also maintain active membership in professional organizations which are involved in graduate or advanced education, research, and global practice of nursing such as the Philippine Association for Graduate Education (PAGE), International Network for Doctoral Education in Nursing (INDEN), Philippine Statistical Association (PSA), Research Advisory Network of the International Confederation of Midwives (RAN-ICM), and Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing (STTI).

The academic staff’s expertise in the different nursing areas of administration, practice, community health, and research are highly sought and valued. The academic staff members render consultation work, peer review, module and practice manual development, and in-service training for professional staff development. A number of them are also involved in quality assurance by serving as assessors/evaluators for CHED and accreditors for accrediting organizations.

RESEARCH AND SCHOLARSHIP OF ACADEMIC STAFF

Academic Staff

Publication

1.       Biag, Al D.

Biag, A.D. (2022). Testing the comparability and interpretability of the revised professional practice environment scale–Filipino version. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice12(6). https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v12n6p31 

Biag, A.D., & Belen, V.L. (2021). Development and psychometric testing of a self-rated scale Based on National Nursing Core Competency Standards. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 30(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1891/jnm-d-20-00049

Mi Yang, E., Kim, J., Biag, A.D., Mangulabnan, J., Dela Cruz, A.E., & Sarmiento, P.J.D. (2020). A study on health and hygiene needs, strategies and well-being of an Aeta indigenous community in the Philippines using photovoice method. Asian Social Work and Policy Review, 14(3) https://doi.org/10.1111/aswp.12203

Biag, A.D., & Angeles, L.S. (2020). Testing the structural equation model of the influence of nurse’ spiritual well-being and caring behaviors on their provision of spiritual care to patients. Journal of Nursing Management 29(4), 822-833. https://dpi.org/10.1111/jonm.13224

David, E.C., & Biag, A.D. (2018). Towards the development of a Counselor-Principal Relationship Inventory. The Guidance Journal, 45(1), 91-105.

2.       Bondoc, Elmer D.

Borrico, C.B.C., Bondoc, E.D. & Dariilag, A. (2019). Predictors of work motivation of nurse academic managers. Philippine Journal of Nursing Education, 28

Bondoc, E.D. (2018). Comparing safekeeping practices in preventing microbial contamination of opened single-use ampules. Philippine Journal of Nursing, 88(2). 

Bondoc, E.D. (2018). Development of the e-learning readiness assessment tool and correlates of the factors with the profiles of nursing students. Philippine Journal of Nursing Education, 27

3.       Borrico, Carlo Bryan C.

Borrico, C.B.C. (2021). Job satisfaction, job stress, and trust in management as predictors to teacher's intention to quit. Asia Pacific Higher Education Research Journal, 8(2).

Borrico, C.B.C. (2020). Registered Nurses perception on Continuing Nursing Education. Asia Pacific Higher Education Research Journal, 7(2). https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/apherj/article/view/1664/477

Borrico, C. B. C., Borrico, C. C., & Borrico, L. P. (2020). Coping with menopause–Measures that women can take. Enfermería Clínica, 30, 38-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.07.008

Borrico, C.B.C., Borrico, C.C., & Borrico, L.C. (2020). Work ethics of the proficient teachers: Basis for a district learning action cell (LAC) Plan. Asia Pacific Higher Education Research Journal, 7(1). https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/apherj/article/view/1543/457

Orte, C.J.S., Bautista, R.A., Borrico, C.B.C., Neo, J.E.C., Parico, A.M., & De Dios, M.A.S. (2020). Comparative study on patient satisfaction on healthcare service delivery in selected private and government hospitals. Enfermería Clínica, 30, 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.07.010

Borrico, C.B.C. (2019). Views about getting older as predictors to self-esteem of professionals nearing retirement. Enfermeria Clinica, 29, 63-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.11.021

Borrico, C.BC., Bondoc, E.D., & Dariilag, A. (2019). Predictors of work motivation of nurse academic managers. Philippine Journal of Nursing Education, 28.

4.       Marquez, Precious Jean M.

Marquez, P.J.M. (2018). Hope and health-related quality of life in patients with cancer undergoing adjuvant therapy. Philippine Journal of Nursing, 88(2). 

5.    Yap, John Federick C.

 Yap, J.F.C., Garcia, L. L., & Yap, L. D. (2021). Death and dying during COVID-19: The role of health care workers. Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdab318

Yap, J.F.C., Garcia, L.L., Alfaro, R.A., & Sarmiento, P.J.D. (2021). Anticipatory grieving and loss during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Public Healthhttps://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa258

Sarmiento, P.J.D., Yap, J.F.C., Espinosa, K.A.C., Ignacio, R.P., & Caro, C.A. (2020). The truth must prevail: Citizens’ rights to know the truth during the era of COVID-19. Journal of Public Health.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa240

6.   Conde, Alita R.

 Tan, H.V.D., & Conde, A.R. (2021). Nurse empowerment – Linking demographics, qualities, and performances of empowered Filipino nurses. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(5), 1302-1310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13270

 

7.   Sombillo, Roberto M.

Matibag, R.S., & Sombillo, R.C. (2021). Impact study on health beyond bar extension services of the Bataan Peninsula State University College of Nursing and Midwifery. African Journal of Health, Nursing, and Midwifery, 4(5), 75-84. doi: 10.52589/AJHNM-BW23IZNF

 

Gutiérrez, J.M.M., Borromeo, A.R., Dueño, A.L., Paragas, E.D. Jr, Ellasus, R.O., Sombillo R.C., et al. (2019). Clinical epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill adult patients: Protocol for a large-scale systematic review and planned meta-analysis. Systematic Review, 8(1), 180. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1080-y.

 

7.   Cura, Jonathan D.

Rodriguez, K., Cura, J. D., & Aringo, R. B., Jr (2022). Fostering a culture of nursing excellence during the COVID-19 crisis. Nursing Management, 53(5), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NUMA.0000829288.87069.25

Cura J. D. (2021). Comparing successful insertions, dwell time, reinsertions and the costs of supplies between integrated and simple short peripheral catheters. The Journal of Vascular Access, 11297298211054893. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298211054893

Felipe, R.J. & Cura, J. (2020). Effects of Self- Determination Theory-Based Intervention on CPAP Treatment of Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Philippine Journal of Nursing, 90 (1). 

Cura, J. (2017). Development of Framework for Clinical Nursing Research Fellowship in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Nursing, 87 (1), 66- 75.

Cura, J. (2015). Respecting autonomous decision making among Filipinos: A re-emphasis in Genetic Counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9823-y

Cura, J. (2012). Interpreting transition from adolescence to adulthood in patients on dialysis who have end-stage renal disease. Journal of Renal Care, 38 (3), 118-123. DOI: 10.1111/j. 1755-6686.2012.00310.x

 

8. Lopez, Violeta

 

Lopez, V., West, S., Anderson, J., Cleary, M. (2022). Does the COVID-19 pandemic further impact nursing shortages? Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 43(3), 293-295. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2021.1977875.

Chong, Lopez, V., Tam, W. (2022). Barriers to healthy eating among nurses working in hospitals: a meta-synthesis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(2), 314-331. doi: 10.1111/jan.14999. 

 

Lopez, V. (2020). Nurses at the forefront of COVID-19 pandemic. Editorial. Nursing Practice Today, 8(1),2-3

 

Parizad, N., Lopez, V., Jasemi, M., Gharaadhaji, R., Taylor, A, Taghinejad, R., (2021 early view May). Job stress and its relationship with nurses’ autonomy and nurse-physician collaboration in intensive care unit. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(7), 2084-2091. doi:10.1111/jonm. 13354.

 

Chung, J.O.K., Li, W.H.C., Ho, K.Y., Lam, K.K.W., Cheung, A.T., Ho, L.K.K., Lin, J.J., Lopez, V. (2021). Adventure-based training to enhance resilience and reduce depressive symptoms among juveniles: A randomised controlled trial. Research in Nursing and Health, 44(3), 438-448. https://doi.1002/nur.22127.

 

Liew S.M., Mordiffi, Z., Ong, Y.J.A., Lopez, V. (2021). Nurses’ perceptions to early mobilisation in patients in the adult intensive care unit: A qualitative study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 66, Doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103039.

 

Soares, S.F., Moura, E.C.C., Lopez, V., Peres, A.M. (2021). Professional nursing communication competence: Theoretical procedures for instrument development and pilot tests. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(6), 1496-1507. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13283.

 

Aghakhani, N., Lopez, V., Parizad, N., Baghaei, R. (2021). “It was like nobody cared about what I said?” Iranian women committed self-immolation” A qualitative study. BMC Women’s Health, 21:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01221-8

 

Hashim, C.G., Taib, N.A., Hwan-Yoon, J., Larkin, D., Yip, D., Lopez, V. (2021) Psychometric assessment of the Malay version of the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14) in women with breast cancer. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 29 (1), E18-38. DOI: 10.1891/JNM-D-19-00068.

 

Lim, V., Moxham, L., Patterson, C., Perlman, D., Lopez, V*., Goh, SY. (2020). Students’ mental health clinical placements, clinical competence and stigma surrounding mental illness: A correlational study. Nurse Education Today. 84. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104219.

 

Siew, A.L., Tay, L.H., Ang, W.H., Lopez, V.* (2020). Survivorship care practices and confidence of oncology nurses in Singapore: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 31(5), 451-459. doi:10.1177/1043659619872792.

 

COMMUNITY SERVICE/EXTENSION

1 . Research Capability Building for JBLMGH-Nursing Service Office

Research enables nurses to identify the best evidence for clinical practice that improves patient outcomes. Nursing research, in particular, has an immense influence on the current and future professional nursing practice. The current practice setting, though, does not provide an opportunity for nurses because research is typically not among the responsibilities of frontline and bedside nurses. While the clinical setting is a rich source of researchable nursing problems there is limited capability of the human resource that is expected to carry out the task of subjecting these problems under a rigorous research process. The nursing academia, on the other hand, is a recognized seedbed of research because of the scholarship produced by its advanced studies-prepared nurse educators. The inherent strength of the academic setting in research will complement the need for capability building of nurses in the practice setting so that they can take the opportunity of developing evidence-based nursing practice and evidence-informed healthcare policies.

It is from these foregoing premises that the extension service of Holy Angel University

School of Nursing and Allied Medical Sciences to Jose B. Lingad Memorial General Hospital (JBLMGH) is based. Under the term of joint undertaking, the nursing professors act as the mentors of staff nurses who were identified to have the potential of becoming nurse researchers. The first batch of nurses forms part of the critical mass of nursing staff trained on all facets of the research process. They are mentored every single step of the way from conceptual, design and planning, empirical, analytic, and dissemination phases. The first two phases are covered in the first part while the last three phases are included in the second part of the capability-building program.

 

2. Outcomes-Based Education Capability Building for Good Samaritan Colleges Faculty

          This extension program aims to build the capability of college faculty of Good Samaritan Colleges in designing and adopting outcomes-based education as framework for their teaching. The expertise and experience of HAU-SNAMS academic staff on outcomes-based teaching and learning are shared with the faculty members of Good Samaritan Colleges through a mentoring approach.